If Mr Vali Moosa is so geat at his job, how come he ensured that there
was no PPP (Public Participation Process) involved in the Implementation
of the 4x4 ban, and that the tourism issues associated with the 4x4 ban
were never brought to the table for discussion?
One needs to read the definition of the term "ADVERSE EFFECTS" in the NEMA (National Environmental Management Act), in conjunction with Section 24 of the South African constitution, then think clearly why
no charge of violation of our rights as is enshrined in the bill of rights (Chapter 2) of the constitution has been brought against Mr Vali Moosa.
Is it perhaps because of the imminent mining of the sand dunes of iSimangaliso wetland park world heritage site along the Elephant Coast and the surrounding areas?
One just needs to think why there is a proposed harbor just north of the iSimangaliso Wetland Park World heritage site in Northern Mozambique , and the picture becomes very clear, Mr. Vali Moosa is
preparing the public for the failure of tourism so that he can offer mining as an alternative income for the residents of this very impoverished area.
Who will oppose a man with such "IMPECCABLE" conservation record?
if we don't do it who will? see this report http://bit.ly/ocasional-paper-20 and think about what I have written....
Is there any way that you could find out why there has not been any PPP (Public Participation Process) meetings around these issues as is mandated by the World heritage Act, the 4X4 ban, The ICMA (Integrated
Coastal Management Act) and other related legislation including the MSA (Municipal Systems Act)?
your input and assistance would be greatly appreciated,.
Regards Frank
Frank Gainsford
072 505 5111
No comments:
Post a Comment